<![CDATA[RoboDK Forum - All Forums]]>

<![CDATA[RoboDK Forum - All Forums]]> https://robodk.com/forum/ Tue, 01 Sep 2026 18:35:26 +0000 MyBB <![CDATA[Request to Add KUKA FORTEC-2 ULTRA KR 800 R3200-2 PA]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Request-to-Add-KUKA-FORTEC-2-ULTRA-KR-800-R3200-2-PA Fri, 28 Aug 2026 16:07:22 +0000 Muddasar.Anwar]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Request-to-Add-KUKA-FORTEC-2-ULTRA-KR-800-R3200-2-PA Hello,

Would it be possible to add KUKA FORTEC-2 ULTRA KR 800 R3200-2 PA to the library?
Please find below link and attached CAD zip.
https://my.kuka.com/s/product/kr-800-r32...=Downloads

Thanks

.zip

KR_800_R3200-2_PA_V01_STP.zip (Size: 10.48 MB / Downloads: 7) ]]> Hello,

Would it be possible to add KUKA FORTEC-2 ULTRA KR 800 R3200-2 PA to the library?
Please find below link and attached CAD zip.
https://my.kuka.com/s/product/kr-800-r32...=Downloads

Thanks

.zip

KR_800_R3200-2_PA_V01_STP.zip (Size: 10.48 MB / Downloads: 7) ]]> <![CDATA[Compensation of 5-axis with the calibration utility]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Compensation-of-5-axis-with-the-calibration-utility Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:43:28 +0000 Marina]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Compensation-of-5-axis-with-the-calibration-utility
I created a station with a customized 5-axis robot. It consists of 3 linear axes (X; Y; Z) and 2 rotatory axes (C around Z and A around X).

I want to use the calibration utility from RoboDK for obtaining the measurements with a Leica laser tracker.

I can measure each point inside the calibration window, but for the "Base setup" and the "Tool setup" I cannot obtain the exact/calibrated position of the base of the robot (therefore the "Measurements Reference"), and the correct position of the reflector respect to the frange.

I already calibrated one robotic arm (6 axis) with this utility fron RoboDK, and the "Base setup" measurements and "Tool setup" measurements were so easy to define. Now that I have another type of robot, I always obtain a message like "measurements does not fit a circle".

How should I proceed now? Is there any way for obtaining the correct position of the "Measurement reference" and the position of the reflector respect to the flange?

Unfortunaly I cannot share my station due to privacity of the company.

I hope you can help me.

Thanks :)

Regards,
Marina]]>
I created a station with a customized 5-axis robot. It consists of 3 linear axes (X; Y; Z) and 2 rotatory axes (C around Z and A around X).

I want to use the calibration utility from RoboDK for obtaining the measurements with a Leica laser tracker.

I can measure each point inside the calibration window, but for the "Base setup" and the "Tool setup" I cannot obtain the exact/calibrated position of the base of the robot (therefore the "Measurements Reference"), and the correct position of the reflector respect to the frange.

I already calibrated one robotic arm (6 axis) with this utility fron RoboDK, and the "Base setup" measurements and "Tool setup" measurements were so easy to define. Now that I have another type of robot, I always obtain a message like "measurements does not fit a circle".

How should I proceed now? Is there any way for obtaining the correct position of the "Measurement reference" and the position of the reflector respect to the flange?

Unfortunaly I cannot share my station due to privacity of the company.

I hope you can help me.

Thanks :)

Regards,
Marina]]> <![CDATA[RoboDK Euler rotation order default choice]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-RoboDK-Euler-rotation-order-default-choice Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:47:44 +0000 majestic]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-RoboDK-Euler-rotation-order-default-choice
What I want is ABB/KUKA order but it's always Staubli/Mecademic instead which make my work prone to errors.

Thanks!]]>
What I want is ABB/KUKA order but it's always Staubli/Mecademic instead which make my work prone to errors.

Thanks!]]> <![CDATA[Tool orientation follows path does not follow path direction]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Tool-orientation-follows-path-does-not-follow-path-direction Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:13:07 +0000 Keisuke.Sakai]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Tool-orientation-follows-path-does-not-follow-path-direction Hello RoboDK Support,

I have attached the RoboDK project file for your review.
In my Machining Project settings, I selected "Tool orientation follows path" (see attached screenshot). However, the generated robot motion does not follow the path direction as expected. The robot follows the path geometry, but the tool orientation does not automatically rotate to align with the path tangent.

Issue Description

Algorithm: Tool orientation follows path
Expected behavior: The tool orientation should rotate and follow the travel direction along the path.
Actual behavior: The tool orientation does not align with the path direction during robot motion.

Could you please help me understand:

Whether additional settings are required to make the tool orientation follow the path direction.
Whether there are any limitations regarding the curve/path definition.
Whether the issue could be related to the reference frame or tool frame configuration.
If my project configuration contains any incorrect settings.

I have attached the project file and would appreciate it if you could review it and advise on the cause of this behavior.
Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Keisuke Sakai

.rdk

AGVルート走行.rdk (Size: 2.91 MB / Downloads: 12) ]]> Hello RoboDK Support,

I have attached the RoboDK project file for your review.
In my Machining Project settings, I selected "Tool orientation follows path" (see attached screenshot). However, the generated robot motion does not follow the path direction as expected. The robot follows the path geometry, but the tool orientation does not automatically rotate to align with the path tangent.

Issue Description

Algorithm: Tool orientation follows path
Expected behavior: The tool orientation should rotate and follow the travel direction along the path.
Actual behavior: The tool orientation does not align with the path direction during robot motion.

Could you please help me understand:

Whether additional settings are required to make the tool orientation follow the path direction.
Whether there are any limitations regarding the curve/path definition.
Whether the issue could be related to the reference frame or tool frame configuration.
If my project configuration contains any incorrect settings.

I have attached the project file and would appreciate it if you could review it and advise on the cause of this behavior.
Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Keisuke Sakai

.rdk

AGVルート走行.rdk (Size: 2.91 MB / Downloads: 12) ]]> <![CDATA[ROKAE Post Processor Compatibility Issue with RC v3.2.2]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-ROKAE-Post-Processor-Compatibility-Issue-with-RC-v3-2-2 Wed, 19 Aug 2026 21:21:37 +0000 Jason25]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-ROKAE-Post-Processor-Compatibility-Issue-with-RC-v3-2-2 Dear RoboDK teams

I am seeing a compatibility issue with RoboDK v6.0.6 and a ROKAE controller running RC v3.2.2.
My environment:

HMI: 5.0.13.0439
RC: 3.2.2
Update: 0.8.15

The program generated by the ROKAE post processor starts with:

Code:
MODULE line_test

GLOBAL VAR robtarget robpoint0 = p:{{532.000, 250.000, 806.000}, {0.707107, 0.000000, 0.707107, 0.000000}, 0}{cfg 0, 0, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}{Ej 0,0,0,0,0,0}

When I paste it into the ROKAE RL Editor, I get error 60000:

Code:
content: [60000] File: 【main.mod】, Line: 【1】Unrecognized tokens: MODULE; File: 【main.mod】, Line: 【2】Unrecognized tokens: 

; 

reason: RL instruction parameter error 

repair: Modify the instruction and enter the correct parameter.

]]> Dear RoboDK teams

I am seeing a compatibility issue with RoboDK v6.0.6 and a ROKAE controller running RC v3.2.2.
My environment:

HMI: 5.0.13.0439
RC: 3.2.2
Update: 0.8.15

The program generated by the ROKAE post processor starts with:

Code:
MODULE line_test

GLOBAL VAR robtarget robpoint0 = p:{{532.000, 250.000, 806.000}, {0.707107, 0.000000, 0.707107, 0.000000}, 0}{cfg 0, 0, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}{Ej 0,0,0,0,0,0}

When I paste it into the ROKAE RL Editor, I get error 60000:

Code:
content: [60000] File: 【main.mod】, Line: 【1】Unrecognized tokens: MODULE; File: 【main.mod】, Line: 【2】Unrecognized tokens: 

; 

reason: RL instruction parameter error 

repair: Modify the instruction and enter the correct parameter.

]]> <![CDATA[Physical Robot Does Not Move When Using Ultralytics YOLO in RoboDK Python Script]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Physical-Robot-Does-Not-Move-When-Using-Ultralytics-YOLO-in-RoboDK-Python-Script Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:14:34 +0000 Muhammad Faizan Ahmed]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Physical-Robot-Does-Not-Move-When-Using-Ultralytics-YOLO-in-RoboDK-Python-Script
I am currently working on a project in RoboDK involving two JAKA collaborative robots (Zu7 and Zu12). I am using a Python script in RoboDK to control the robots and integrate a real-time vision system using a USB webcam and a YOLO11n model.

My robot movement program works correctly and the physical robots move as expected when I run the script without the YOLO/Ultralytics import.

However, when I add:

Code:
from ultralytics import YOLO

the RoboDK simulation continues to work, but the physical robots do not move. Interestingly, if I comment out the Ultralytics import, the physical robot movement works again.

I am using:

RoboDK
Python 3.10.11
Ultralytics
OpenCV
YOLO11n
JAKA Zu7 and Zu12

The Ultralytics package is installed in the same Python virtual environment used by RoboDK, and importing YOLO works successfully in a standalone Python test.

My intended workflow is:

Move the robots to predefined positions using RoboDK.
Start the webcam-based YOLO11n vision system.
Detect the needle and gripper states.
Based on the detection, continue the robot movement sequence.
Execute the same sequence on the physical JAKA robots.

The main issue is that the RoboDK simulation executes the movements, but the physical robot does not move when Ultralytics is imported.

Could the Ultralytics/PyTorch libraries interfere with RoboDK's physical robot driver, Python execution, or communication with the robot?
Is there a recommended way to run YOLO/OpenCV vision processing alongside RoboDK's physical robot control without preventing the robot driver from executing?
Would it be better to run the vision processing in a separate Python process/thread and communicate the detection result to the RoboDK script?

Any guidance on how to diagnose this issue would be greatly appreciated. See the attached code file for reference.
Thank you.

.txt

Complete Code.txt (Size: 17.49 KB / Downloads: 11) ]]>
I am currently working on a project in RoboDK involving two JAKA collaborative robots (Zu7 and Zu12). I am using a Python script in RoboDK to control the robots and integrate a real-time vision system using a USB webcam and a YOLO11n model.

My robot movement program works correctly and the physical robots move as expected when I run the script without the YOLO/Ultralytics import.

However, when I add:

Code:
from ultralytics import YOLO

the RoboDK simulation continues to work, but the physical robots do not move. Interestingly, if I comment out the Ultralytics import, the physical robot movement works again.

I am using:

RoboDK
Python 3.10.11
Ultralytics
OpenCV
YOLO11n
JAKA Zu7 and Zu12

The Ultralytics package is installed in the same Python virtual environment used by RoboDK, and importing YOLO works successfully in a standalone Python test.

My intended workflow is:

Move the robots to predefined positions using RoboDK.
Start the webcam-based YOLO11n vision system.
Detect the needle and gripper states.
Based on the detection, continue the robot movement sequence.
Execute the same sequence on the physical JAKA robots.

The main issue is that the RoboDK simulation executes the movements, but the physical robot does not move when Ultralytics is imported.

Could the Ultralytics/PyTorch libraries interfere with RoboDK's physical robot driver, Python execution, or communication with the robot?
Is there a recommended way to run YOLO/OpenCV vision processing alongside RoboDK's physical robot control without preventing the robot driver from executing?
Would it be better to run the vision processing in a separate Python process/thread and communicate the detection result to the RoboDK script?

Any guidance on how to diagnose this issue would be greatly appreciated. See the attached code file for reference.
Thank you.

.txt

Complete Code.txt (Size: 17.49 KB / Downloads: 11) ]]> <![CDATA[MoveJ Commands Generated by the URP Post Processor]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-MoveJ-Commands-Generated-by-the-URP-Post-Processor Tue, 18 Aug 2026 23:56:56 +0000 Keisuke.Sakai]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-MoveJ-Commands-Generated-by-the-URP-Post-Processor Dear Support Team,

I would like to inquire about the generation of MoveJ instructions by the Universal Robots URP post processor.
Environment:

Post Processor: Universal Robots URP
RoboDK Version: v6.0.4 (64-bit)

During program generation, MoveJ instructions are inserted in certain locations.
However, I have verified that the generated program still runs correctly even after manually removing those MoveJ instructions.

Therefore, I would like to understand the reason why these MoveJ instructions are being generated.
Could you please clarify:

Under what conditions the URP post processor inserts MoveJ commands
Whether these MoveJ commands are intended to ensure safety, reachability, or robot configuration consistency
Or whether unnecessary MoveJ commands may be generated in some cases

I have attached the relevant program for your review.
Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Keisuke Sakai

.png

スクリーンショット 2026-08-19 085632.png (Size: 275.16 KB / Downloads: 25) ]]> Dear Support Team,

I would like to inquire about the generation of MoveJ instructions by the Universal Robots URP post processor.
Environment:

Post Processor: Universal Robots URP
RoboDK Version: v6.0.4 (64-bit)

Under what conditions the URP post processor inserts MoveJ commands
Whether these MoveJ commands are intended to ensure safety, reachability, or robot configuration consistency
Or whether unnecessary MoveJ commands may be generated in some cases

I have attached the relevant program for your review.
Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Keisuke Sakai

.png

スクリーンショット 2026-08-19 085632.png (Size: 275.16 KB / Downloads: 25) ]]> <![CDATA[Joint movement using cartesian targets is not supported for Fairino robot]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Joint-movement-using-cartesian-targets-is-not-supported-for-Fairino-robot Tue, 18 Aug 2026 23:47:48 +0000 Keisuke.Sakai]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Joint-movement-using-cartesian-targets-is-not-supported-for-Fairino-robot Hi RoboDK teams,

I encountered the following error while generating a program for the FAIRINO FR3MT robot in RoboDK:

Quote:Joint movement using cartesian targets is not supported. Change the target type to joint or use a cartesian movement.

Environment:

RoboDK Version 6.0.1
Robot: FAIRINO FR3MT

Program structure:

MoveL(Target 1)
MoveJ(Target 2)

The MoveL instruction is generated correctly, but the MoveJ instruction produces the above error.
Target 2 was intentionally created as a Joint Target in RoboDK. However, during program generation it appears to be treated as a Cartesian Target by the FAIRINO post processor.
Could you please clarify the following points?

Does the FAIRINO post processor support MoveJ only when the destination target is a Joint Target?
Is there any known issue where a Joint Target may be interpreted as a Cartesian Target during program generation?
Are there any RoboDK settings that should be checked (Reference Frame, Tool, Target Type, etc.)?
Could this be a limitation or bug in the current FAIRINO post processor?

A screenshot is attached for reference.

Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Keisuke Sakai

.png

スクリーンショット 2026-08-19 084146.png (Size: 165.79 KB / Downloads: 23)

.rdk

test.rdk (Size: 4.28 MB / Downloads: 21) ]]> Hi RoboDK teams,

I encountered the following error while generating a program for the FAIRINO FR3MT robot in RoboDK:

Quote:Joint movement using cartesian targets is not supported. Change the target type to joint or use a cartesian movement.

Environment:

RoboDK Version 6.0.1
Robot: FAIRINO FR3MT

Program structure:

MoveL(Target 1)
MoveJ(Target 2)

Does the FAIRINO post processor support MoveJ only when the destination target is a Joint Target?
Is there any known issue where a Joint Target may be interpreted as a Cartesian Target during program generation?
Are there any RoboDK settings that should be checked (Reference Frame, Tool, Target Type, etc.)?
Could this be a limitation or bug in the current FAIRINO post processor?

A screenshot is attached for reference.

Thank you for your support.

Best regards,
Keisuke Sakai

.png

スクリーンショット 2026-08-19 084146.png (Size: 165.79 KB / Downloads: 23)

.rdk

test.rdk (Size: 4.28 MB / Downloads: 21) ]]> <![CDATA[Request to add the KUKA KR 50 R2500-2 robot]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Request-to-add-the-KUKA-KR-50-R2500-2-robot Tue, 18 Aug 2026 02:08:31 +0000 badman]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Request-to-add-the-KUKA-KR-50-R2500-2-robot I am currently using a KUKA KR 50 R2500-2 with a KR C5 controller.
I noticed that the KUKA KR 50 R2500 currently available in the RoboDK Robot Library is different from the newer KR 50 R2500-2 currently offered by KUKA.
The robot I am using is:

Robot: KUKA KR 50 R2500-2
Payload: 50 kg
Reach: 2500 mm
Controller: KR C5

As shown in the attached comparison image, the mechanical design of the KR 50 R2500-2 is different from the KR 50 R2500 model currently available in the RoboDK library, particularly around the wrist and upper-arm structure.
Could you please add the KUKA KR 50 R2500-2 to the official RoboDK Robot Library?
The specifications and product information for this robot can be found on the official KUKA website under the KR IONTEC series.
It would be very helpful to have the current KR 50 R2500-2 model available in RoboDK for accurate simulation, collision checking, and offline programming with the KR C5 controller.
Thank you for your support.

.png

6d3b60d2a09a4adf2a504a7ec06526df.png (Size: 275.19 KB / Downloads: 22) ]]> I am currently using a KUKA KR 50 R2500-2 with a KR C5 controller.
I noticed that the KUKA KR 50 R2500 currently available in the RoboDK Robot Library is different from the newer KR 50 R2500-2 currently offered by KUKA.
The robot I am using is:

Robot: KUKA KR 50 R2500-2
Payload: 50 kg
Reach: 2500 mm
Controller: KR C5

6d3b60d2a09a4adf2a504a7ec06526df.png (Size: 275.19 KB / Downloads: 22) ]]> <![CDATA[How to use D415 with UR5 in simulation environment]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-How-to-use-D415-with-UR5-in-simulation-environment Thu, 13 Aug 2026 10:11:44 +0000 jeanclaude]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-How-to-use-D415-with-UR5-in-simulation-environment <![CDATA[Cannot find the frame for robot machining]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Cannot-find-the-frame-for-robot-machining Mon, 10 Aug 2026 01:20:49 +0000 b05611018]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Cannot-find-the-frame-for-robot-machining
When I opened the project next time, I noticed that the frames cannot be found in the machining settings. It only showed the new-created frame.

Is it a bug or I did something wrong?

.rdk

PraanaTech framework.rdk (Size: 2.4 MB / Downloads: 23) ]]>
When I opened the project next time, I noticed that the frames cannot be found in the machining settings. It only showed the new-created frame.

Is it a bug or I did something wrong?

.rdk

PraanaTech framework.rdk (Size: 2.4 MB / Downloads: 23) ]]> <![CDATA[Inserted custom code does not execute on robot]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Inserted-custom-code-does-not-execute-on-robot Fri, 07 Aug 2026 14:20:39 +0000 jheimann]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Inserted-custom-code-does-not-execute-on-robot
If I generate the robot program and copy and paste the code from VSCodium into Ufactory Studio and run it, the program works (gripper opens and closes). Why does it not work when running the program from RoboDK with the Run on Robot selected? This is a major detriment to debugging as I can't use my gripper at all.

Also, and much less important... when I select Send Program to Robot, it does not get put on my robot... where does it go and how do I get it to the robot?

.rdk

DEBUR Fusion Import rev 3.rdk (Size: 1.78 MB / Downloads: 40) ]]>
If I generate the robot program and copy and paste the code from VSCodium into Ufactory Studio and run it, the program works (gripper opens and closes). Why does it not work when running the program from RoboDK with the Run on Robot selected? This is a major detriment to debugging as I can't use my gripper at all.

Also, and much less important... when I select Send Program to Robot, it does not get put on my robot... where does it go and how do I get it to the robot?

.rdk

DEBUR Fusion Import rev 3.rdk (Size: 1.78 MB / Downloads: 40) ]]> <![CDATA[Request to add ABB CRB-1910-PoWa13 robot]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Request-to-add-ABB-CRB-1910-PoWa13-robot Fri, 07 Aug 2026 04:50:28 +0000 jsw]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Request-to-add-ABB-CRB-1910-PoWa13-robot Please refer to the link below and the attached compressed CAD file.

Thank you.

.zip

CRB1910_13kg-1340_OmniCore_rev00_STEP_J.zip (Size: 8.14 MB / Downloads: 50) ]]> Please refer to the link below and the attached compressed CAD file.

Thank you.

.zip

CRB1910_13kg-1340_OmniCore_rev00_STEP_J.zip (Size: 8.14 MB / Downloads: 50) ]]> <![CDATA[Not generating output file using API]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Not-generating-output-file-using-API Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:41:04 +0000 samrobodk]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-Not-generating-output-file-using-API
The problem I am having is that no file is created, and I am at a complete loss. I have tried 100+ variants and looked at every doc and example I can find.

Manual program generation and MakeProgram() both work, but I need the stream recorded instead.

ProgramStart returns 0 errors, but no robot program file is generated after RDK.Finish().

I reproduced the same issue with a clean ABB station using ABB_RAPID_IRC5 and separately with FANUC using Fanuc_R30i.

Is there an additional step required when using RUNMODE_MAKE_ROBOTPROG and ProgramStart, , or am I misunderstanding the intended use of this run mode?

RoboDK 6.0.6, Python 3.13, robodk package 5.9.4.

Code:

Code:
from robodk.robolink import *

import time

RDK = Robolink()

RDK.AddFile("C:/Users/Sam/code/robodk_stations/test_station.rdk")

robot = RDK.Item("ABB CRB 1300-7/1.4", ITEM_TYPE_ROBOT)

t1 = RDK.Item("safe_target_1", ITEM_TYPE_TARGET)

t2 = RDK.Item("safe_target_2", ITEM_TYPE_TARGET)

RDK.setRunMode(RUNMODE_MAKE_ROBOTPROG)

errors = RDK.ProgramStart(

    "Prog123",

    "C:/Users/Sam/Downloads/",

    "ABB_RAPID_IRC5",

    robot

)

print("ProgramStart errors:", errors)

robot.MoveJ(t1)

robot.MoveL(t2)

RDK.Finish()

test_station.rdk (Size: 1.65 MB / Downloads: 49) ]]>
The problem I am having is that no file is created, and I am at a complete loss. I have tried 100+ variants and looked at every doc and example I can find.

Manual program generation and MakeProgram() both work, but I need the stream recorded instead.

ProgramStart returns 0 errors, but no robot program file is generated after RDK.Finish().

I reproduced the same issue with a clean ABB station using ABB_RAPID_IRC5 and separately with FANUC using Fanuc_R30i.

Is there an additional step required when using RUNMODE_MAKE_ROBOTPROG and ProgramStart, , or am I misunderstanding the intended use of this run mode?

RoboDK 6.0.6, Python 3.13, robodk package 5.9.4.

Code:

Code:
from robodk.robolink import *

import time

RDK = Robolink()

RDK.AddFile("C:/Users/Sam/code/robodk_stations/test_station.rdk")

robot = RDK.Item("ABB CRB 1300-7/1.4", ITEM_TYPE_ROBOT)

t1 = RDK.Item("safe_target_1", ITEM_TYPE_TARGET)

t2 = RDK.Item("safe_target_2", ITEM_TYPE_TARGET)

RDK.setRunMode(RUNMODE_MAKE_ROBOTPROG)

errors = RDK.ProgramStart(

    "Prog123",

    "C:/Users/Sam/Downloads/",

    "ABB_RAPID_IRC5",

    robot

)

print("ProgramStart errors:", errors)

robot.MoveJ(t1)

robot.MoveL(t2)

RDK.Finish()

test_station.rdk (Size: 1.65 MB / Downloads: 49) ]]> <![CDATA[For loop in robodk V5.5.3]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-For-loop-in-robodk-V5-5-3 Wed, 05 Aug 2026 08:49:13 +0000 Ninad Joshi]]> https://robodk.com/forum/Thread-For-loop-in-robodk-V5-5-3 I want to use For loop in the main program for running a specific code 7 times.
I wrote the following code in insert code command;

i = 1
FOR i = 1 TO 7

ENDFOR

I have enabled 'Enable Flow Control Statements' option in the station parameters.
After executing the program, I can not see i value incremented. It is showing error " SyntaxError: Expected token `,' "
How to solve this? Is this a version issue? And is there any documentation for how to use loops and conditional statements in the insert code command?

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!!]]> I want to use For loop in the main program for running a specific code 7 times.
I wrote the following code in insert code command;

i = 1
FOR i = 1 TO 7

ENDFOR

I have enabled 'Enable Flow Control Statements' option in the station parameters.
After executing the program, I can not see i value incremented. It is showing error " SyntaxError: Expected token `,' "
How to solve this? Is this a version issue? And is there any documentation for how to use loops and conditional statements in the insert code command?

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!!]]>